Ah, now I remember, why I thought about a more squeaky
SourceForge:

Having an integration-server, which runs all
the available tests and sends a mail to the maintainers of the
application, if there is an error when integrating it in the current
version of "core / base / all", would be better than SourceForge, no?

Still thinking about that crazy idea of an intergration-server, which
only stores code, which is executable by some test-calls...
Too crazy, no?

Markus

Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:

> Von: Markus Gaelli <gaelli at emergent.de>
> Datum: Mi, 19. Mär 2003  00:25:55 Europe/Berlin
> An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list 
> <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> Betreff: Re: Can't download SmaCC from SqueakMap
>
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Markus Gaelli wrote:
>>
>>> We really need some SourceForge like thing, where we can have several
>>> maintainers of some packages.
>>
>> What's wrong with SourceForge itself?
>
> Aeh, nothing?
> Maybe it's the "not invented by squeakers"-syndrome :-)
>
> Good idea, I'll move it there, now it's time for bed...
>
> Markus
>
>> All of my public Squeak code is maintained in the "seaside" SF 
>> project.
>> Combined with DVS, that's worked out pretty well.
>>
>> Avi
>>
>>
>