Andrew, what do you think is the most sensible way?


-----Original Message-----
From:	Andrew C. Greenberg [mailto:werdna at mucow.com]
Sent:	Tue 3/25/2003 9:03 PM
To:	The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Cc:	
Subject:	Re: [ANN] Closure Compiler
On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 03:55 PM, Cees de Groot wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 21:06, Andrew C. Greenberg wrote:
>> Please don't do this folks.  We have enough licensing issues already.
>> Promiscuously cross-licensing like this could kill either SM or 
>> Squeak,
>> or both.
>>
> Or neither. Most likely outcome, I believe.

Excellent bit of lawyering.  Too bad you are not one.  I am here to say 
that we have a problem.  There are way more sensible ways to fix this 
than to ignore or exacerbate it.  If this is the approach the community 
takes, count me out.  I would have no more time to waste for a dying 
project that doesn't even yet know it is legally dead.





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 2815 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030325/fb9c55c5/attachment.bin