On Thu, 1 May 2003 diegogomezdeck at consultar.com wrote:

> I propose to create a ProgressBarMorph (using the code on
> FlashProgressMorph).
>
> Then I can change FlashProgressMorph to be a subclass of ProgressBarMorph
> or just delete FlashProgressMorph (and use ProgressBarMorph).
>
> I'll produce 2 changesets: one with the refactoring I'm talking about and
> the second one with the look changes.
>
> Do you agree?

I would definitely like to see ProgressMorph not depend on Flash - I've
always been annoyed that I had to keep the flash support in my image just
to use Ned's TestRunner enhancements.

So sounds good to me.

Avi