Convincing a harvester (was on SqF list)
Daniel Vainsencher
danielv at netvision.net.il
Wed May 7 01:59:05 UTC 2003
Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Which makes me think ... perhaps I'm really fighting for the name more than
> the content. I want the name "Squeak" be associated with a playful media
> environment, not with a "development architecture".
But while maybe most people first got wowwed by the media, I don't think
its what most people in this community end up messing around with.
I think each one ends up doing his own thing, which Squeak is pretty
wonderful at supporting, and can be made to support even better.
> (see www.squeak.org today). What a difference :-( Somehow I'm still trying
> to live by the "old dream" of Squeak but it seems that this is no longer the
> goal for the driving forces in this community. Sigh...
There you go again with "the goal". I think there's place enough in
Squeak for several groups, with different but compatible goals, each
expressed in their own ideal release image.
> Sadly,
> - Andreas
Daniel, Perplexed.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|