[BUG] HTTPSocket primitive failure

Brent Vukmer bvukmer at blackboard.com
Tue May 13 17:50:11 UTC 2003


Erm... Yes.  It does seem like the right thing to do.  I should have read the error stack more closely before mailing the bug report.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Raab [mailto:andreas.raab at gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 1:47 PM
> To: 'The general-purpose Squeak developers list'
> Subject: RE: [BUG] HTTPSocket primitive failure
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Failing the primitive if the connection has been closed by 
> the server seems
> like the right thing to do. Or not?
> 
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> > [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Brent Vukmer
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 6:47 PM
> > To: Squeak-Dev (E-mail)
> > Subject: [BUG] HTTPSocket primitive failure
> > 
> > 
> > I see this error after calling HTTPSocket>>httpGetDocument 
> > about 1000 times:
> > 
> > 13 May 2003 12:30:08 pm
> > 
> > VM: Win32 - Squeak3.4 of 1 March 2003 [latest update: #5170]
> > Image: Squeak3.6alpha [latest update: #5205]
> > 
> > HTTPSocket(Object)>>error:
> > 	Receiver: a HTTPSocket[otherEndClosedButNotThisEnd]
> 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list