[BUG] HTTPSocket primitive failure
Brent Vukmer
bvukmer at blackboard.com
Tue May 13 17:50:11 UTC 2003
Erm... Yes. It does seem like the right thing to do. I should have read the error stack more closely before mailing the bug report.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Raab [mailto:andreas.raab at gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 1:47 PM
> To: 'The general-purpose Squeak developers list'
> Subject: RE: [BUG] HTTPSocket primitive failure
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Failing the primitive if the connection has been closed by
> the server seems
> like the right thing to do. Or not?
>
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On
> > Behalf Of Brent Vukmer
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 6:47 PM
> > To: Squeak-Dev (E-mail)
> > Subject: [BUG] HTTPSocket primitive failure
> >
> >
> > I see this error after calling HTTPSocket>>httpGetDocument
> > about 1000 times:
> >
> > 13 May 2003 12:30:08 pm
> >
> > VM: Win32 - Squeak3.4 of 1 March 2003 [latest update: #5170]
> > Image: Squeak3.6alpha [latest update: #5205]
> >
> > HTTPSocket(Object)>>error:
> > Receiver: a HTTPSocket[otherEndClosedButNotThisEnd]
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|