copy yourself ?
jan ziak
ziakjan at host.sk
Thu May 22 23:01:57 UTC 2003
On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:52:06 +0200, Chris Burkert wrote
>
> But this wouldn't be 'objectoriented' in it's definition. Remember
> that the objectoriented way is not an exact simulation of the real
> world (but it comes close to it).
>
of course.
> Maybe you should take a look at 'functional programming'.
why?
>
> Not everything in the world is objectoriented and not everything is
> functional ... you have to decide for each problem what would be the
> 'best' environment to solve it.
>
> Regards
> Chris Burkert
>
> PS: Smalltalk is still my favourite language for solving problems!!!
> --
> http://www.chrisburkert.de/
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|