is squeak really object oriented ?
ziakjan at host.sk
Fri May 23 13:37:55 UTC 2003
On Fri, 23 May 2003 07:25:03 -0500, Chris Pettitt wrote
> I suppose I wouldn't mind as much if I did get three copies of the email
> every time. I'd rather read my mail then maintain it :).
forgive me as it was my fault, but i didn't realize it at first. but i could
have blamed your mail client for that because it does not "see" that there
are comming copies of the same message ...
> Bottom line, IMO (since we're all talking about opinions), is that
> Jan should go write his/her own language, as he/she is so unhappy
> with Smalltalk and its "non-object-orientedness". It is easy just to
> complain about what doesn't fit a persons viewpoint. It is another
> thing to go do something about it.
> BTW how would you break out of such a loop in Squeak?
> - Chris
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <diegogomezdeck at consultar.com>
> To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 6:23 AM
> Subject: Re: is squeak really object oriented ?
> > Chris,
> > It's really simple: Just don't read the emails you don't like.
> > This list is for everybody, isn't it?
> > I found the jan's emails the most motivating ones in weeks.
> > Diego
> > > Darnit, I started running this code yesterday and my Sqeuak VM hasn't
> > > responded since... How do I stop it?!
> > >
> > > jan _ AnnoyanceWithNoPoint new.
> > > [
> > > jan annoyOthersAndDistractThemFromUsefulConversation:
> > > 'squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org'.
> > > true.
> > > ] whileTrue.
> > >
> > > - Chris
More information about the Squeak-dev