is squeak really object oriented ?
jan ziak
ziakjan at host.sk
Fri May 23 13:53:59 UTC 2003
point (2) once again...
On Fri, 23 May 2003 07:25:03 -0500, Chris Pettitt wrote
> Bottom line, IMO (since we're all talking about opinions), is that
> Jan should go write his/her own language, as he/she is so unhappy
> with Smalltalk and its "non-object-orientedness". It is easy just to
> complain about what doesn't fit a persons viewpoint. It is another
> thing to go do something about it.
2. i am writing that language. for example i have developed an image format
which is not constrained, say, to holding 32-bit numbers, but arbitrary
natural numbers, so i do not need to bother myself with constraints following
from using X-bit numbers...you can say that it is obvious how to develop a
format for such an image, but my opinion is that obvious small changes are
also changes...
note: it is not an image format for squeak
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|