embedded or not

David Harris dpharris at telus.net
Sun May 25 21:18:56 UTC 2003


Hi-
I actually appreciate changed subject lines :-)
I ran your page through Bablefish and it was a little more 
comprehensible.  (http://babelfish.altavista.com/)
David

Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:

>On Sunday 25 May 2003 10:53, Ned Konz wrote:
>  
>
>>There is the WISP project (http://www.wisp-lang.org) from Martin
>>McClure and Travis Griggs that is porting a version of Pocket
>>Smalltalk to the 16-bit world.
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for the link! I see that there will be a presentation of another 
>embedded Smalltalk at Smalltalk Solutions 2003:
>
> http://www.smalltalksolutions.com/schedule/presentations.htm#Rabb0
>
>And while the project I am currently finishing is an embedded machine 
>(with a compiled Smalltalk, not an interpreted one) the $30 computer I 
>was talking about in a previous message was a general purpose one for 
>kids.
>
>-- Jecel
>P.S.: does it bother people that I changed the subject line when the 
>topic drifts (obviously not a list tradition) or is it a good idea?
>P.S2.: there are progress reports (Portugues only, sorry) with pictures 
>if anybody is interested: http://www.merlintec.com:8080/hardware/14
>
>
>  
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list