No Hungarian Notation in Smalltalk - was
[KCP]Event notification call for feedback
Brent Pinkney
brent.pinkney at aircom.co.za
Tue Nov 4 16:51:48 UTC 2003
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:36:55 +0100, Peter van Rooijen
<peter at vanrooijen.com> wrote:
> May I add that I agree with you that this convention exists (and I agree
> with the convention), but only inasfar as the convention is "system
> classes
> don't need prefixes or suffixes". This doesn't mean they can't reasonably
> have them, just that they don't _need_ them.
Nope - see below
>> So the other *Exception classes in the image are incorrect.
>
> I agree there too; it is important to be consistent. IBM Smalltalk has
> avoided the whole problem from the start by prefixing e.g. the system
> exception classes with Ex, as in ExError.
>
But there is no ExInteger or ExString is there ?
See my other post for why you are confusing disambiguation with hungarian
notation.
> Cheers,
>
> Peter van Rooijen
> Amsterdam
>
Regards,
Brent Pinknet
ex-Amsterdam
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|