Hi ar,

(du you have a name?)

ar wrote:
> Stephen,
> 
> Thanks for filling in some of the gaps for me.
> 
> 
>> My advice is to load Comanche 6.2 
>>(KomHttpServer on SqueakMap) and try out the SmallWiki package and see 
>>if it will meet your needs.  If you want to stick with the old Swiki, 
>>then my advice is to download and use one of the pre-configured images 
>>for ComSwiki and don't use Comanche 6.2 or Squeak 3.6.
> 
> 
> SmallWiki looks like it would fit my needs nicely if if were stable
> enough. Then I can save myself (actually the host of my UML linux box)
> the extra 6M or so of ram to run swiki separately from my main image, or
> my gray hairs trying to getting it running in 3.6.
> 
> But whereas swiki has been absolutely rock-solid, it looks like Squeak/
> Smallwiki might need some seasoning yet.
> 
> On the initial page, I tried changing the title of the page from
> 'Smallwiki'. Without touching the page content, I pressed save and got and
> error in SWWikiScanner>>step, where it is trying to put a string to a
> WriteStream built on a string. This is because the input steam
> contents are an OrderedCollection on the page content string
> instead of the page content string itself. Can anyone reproduce this?

SmallWiki 0.9.20 is still not stable on squeak, it is not even 
yet announced for squeak. The reason I put it on Squeakmap is, to 
get some help by other people.

So if you want a stable SmallWiki, use the current VW version 
(better wait for 1.0). I will try to keep in sync with the VW 
version (maybe we can reach this with monticello). If you want to 
help me, please do so!

Please keep in mind that I do this work in my rare spare time ... 
like many squeakers :)

Regards
            Chris Burkert
-- 
http://www.chrisburkert.de/