ducasse wrote:

>>>
>>
>> That is encouraging (more than the comments in the package header on
>> Squeakmap!)
>
> chris could you be explicit about the difference between 
> SmallWiki/Squeak and SmallWiki/VW in the package on Squeak Map because 
> it would be bad that people think that SmallWiki in general is bad. 


Stef,

I had a quick look at it and in general it is not stable yet...it looks 
to me like they are just VW vs Squeak differences that need to be ironed 
out.  For example, I don't think any of the persistence backends are 
working (just in memory storage).

But, the package clearly states that the port is full of bugs right 
now...so I don't think anyone will think SmallWiki is bad...just that 
the port is not yet finished.

- Stephen