Cees de Groot wrote:
> Jimmie Houchin  <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org> said:
> 
>>I believe I read something somewhere about some using VNC for remote 
>>administration.
> 
> Yup. There's a built-in VNC server but I don't know how good it is. I
> usually attach my Squeak server images to a tight-VNC server
> (www.tightvnc.com) - the idea is that you make a ~/.vnc/xstartup that
> just starts up Squeak, no window manager or other frills.
> 
> 
>>Which image is best?
>>What preparations to the image to strip it down for a server image?
> 
> I have never bothered to strip an image for a server. My theory is that
> all the unused stuff will get paged out by the OS sooner or later, and
> swapspace is cheaper than my time :-). With 3.6, I'd start with a basic
> rather than a full image and then load the worlds-of-squeak-removal
> package, but that is mostly it.

Hi Cees,

Thanks for the reply.

Squeak setup sounds good.

It appears that tight-VNC will require X11 on the server, correct?

Thanks for the tight-VNC suggestion.

Jimmie Houchin