Virtual Host with Multiple IP Addresses and Squeak
Claes-Fredrik Mannby
cf at mannby.com
Sat Nov 15 01:29:26 UTC 2003
Thanks. Using the data at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/squeak/message/69058 I was able to create
a new VM and Squeak primitives.
But, the file-in had 3.6 dependencies, so I started upgrading from 3.5
to 3.6, and now I'm a bit lost:
The new class Socket has a method getData which I have been using, that
calls self waitForDataUntil:, which is now only implemented by
OldSocket.
Can I read up somewhere on what's been going on with the Socket classes
lately?
Thanks again for your help,
Fred
On Nov 14, 2003, at 4:05 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:
> A while back there was a change set posted to enable this
> sqSocketListenOnPortBacklogSizeInterface
>
> Mind I don't think it got into 3.6?
>
> The unix code (unix & os-x) got changed to support it, but I can't say
> which VM actually has the support in it.
> Of course you need the change set to call it which I believe was
> discussed on the list Sept 1st.
>
> On Nov 14, 2003, at 3:50 PM, Claes-Fredrik Mannby wrote:
>
>> Is there any way in Squeak to set up a TCP socket to only listen to a
>> specific port and IP address combination? Apache, for example, allows
>> you to do this, and I have set aside an IP address for Squeak, so
>> that I can use a regular port 80 for web content from Squeak. But, I
>> don't see how the Socket primitives would allow listening on only one
>> IP address.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> =======================================================================
> ====
> John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> 1-800-477-2659
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> =======================================================================
> ====
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|