Fwd: [REQUEST] change command+w
Chris Muller
afunkyobject at yahoo.com
Thu Nov 20 01:47:02 UTC 2003
I forgot another great side-effect.
You could then use Command+w+m as a "spell-check" for the selector you just
typed. A good alternative to command+q, and just leave your finger on the
Command key and press "w" again to close the window. Or, it's right there if
you want to verify it's implementation..
Sweet!
--- Chris Muller <afunkyobject at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:41:35 -0800 (PST)
> From: Chris Muller <afunkyobject at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [REQUEST] change command+w
> To: Squeak List <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>
>
> Can we change command+w in text-editor panes to, instead of deleting the
> prior
> word, merely select it.
>
> This has a couple of benefits:
>
> - it provides a non-intrusive "confirmation" to the user
> - provides a handy alternative to deletion, such as cut or copy.
>
> Impact is nil, since no additional or different keystrokes are needed to
> "delete word"; as before, just continue typing.
>
> It almost feels more "object-oriented" too.. you are selecting the prior word
> "object" so you can then invoke your choice of most common editor "messages"
> for it..
>
> I'm not familiar with the involved classes, it's probably a really simple
> change. Does anyone know?
>
> Does it sound like a good candidate for base-behavior?
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|