Idea: "Timeout" submissions?

Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de
Thu Oct 2 16:44:49 UTC 2003


On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:10:46PM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> Let me be blunt, but don't take it personally -
> Did you review/test a fix by someone else? 
> If not, why do you think it reasonable to expect that your fixes in turn
> will be reviewed in a timely fashion? If most people don't help, the
> rate of work getting done is slow.
> 
And, uhm, just in case:

helping to get stuff harvested can be really simple: The trivial
things suck in the most time. e.g. 
 -> amzingly many people havn't yet found the "mail to list"
    feature of the changesorter. So the harvesters burn losts
    of time to resend stuff as proper, gzip-compressed changsets.
    Anyone can help here!
 -> Testing. Just a [et] "I filed this in and it did what it
    claimed". 
 -> Say you opinion. There's lots of stuff to work on. If you
    actually use something, tell so. If you want it included,
    yell...

  Marcus

-- 
Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list