Idea: "Timeout" submissions?
danielv at netvision.net.il
Sat Oct 4 16:15:16 UTC 2003
Lex Spoon <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
> > As far as
> > I know, nobody bothers to ever [closed] bug reports, because they don't
> > bother anyone anyway - nobody is looking at them.
> Well, this seems blatantly the wrong way to do things.
I'm not saying its right, I'm saying its a fact, and as far as I know,
always has been.
> We should have a
> real bug reporting mechanism. People should be able to report bugs
> without having a fix for them, and those reports should be managed.
I don't understand what you mean by "managed". I hate to see the waste
coming from peoples bug reports being used as little as they are now.
Adding to that more wasted energy of tracking them seems meaningless,
unless they are *used* for something. Can you please elaborate how you
think we could incorporate bug reports into the communities work?
Because right now it isn't a part of our work, and I think finding the
right way to integrate it is the only way we'll get more benefit from
More information about the Squeak-dev