Two 3.6 issues

ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Fri Oct 24 16:37:33 UTC 2003


Hi richard

I used for my book an old changeset you submitted for Array2D. Do you 
mean that we should replace
the current Array2D which is ugly and a big hack by your submission.

Or should we use Matrix. Let us know.

Stef

On Vendredi, oct 24, 2003, at 09:52 Europe/Zurich, Marcus Denker wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:21:07PM +1300, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
>> (1) They used Array2D.  They said that their code would not work
>> in 3.5 "because of an Array2D bug".  I thought it had been decided
>> that Array2D would not be included in 3.6 because it is just too
>> confusing?  (Their code would have been clearer with an array of
>> arrays anyway.)
>>
> Somebody should do:
> a) make a Array2D package available on SqueakMap
> b) post a [ENH] Array2D-removal to the list
> c) review the Matrix class (that Richard built last year)
>    I think this (or something like that) should be part
>    of the image.
>
>   Marcus
>
> -- 
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
>
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list