Two 3.6 issues
ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Fri Oct 24 16:37:33 UTC 2003
Hi richard
I used for my book an old changeset you submitted for Array2D. Do you
mean that we should replace
the current Array2D which is ugly and a big hack by your submission.
Or should we use Matrix. Let us know.
Stef
On Vendredi, oct 24, 2003, at 09:52 Europe/Zurich, Marcus Denker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:21:07PM +1300, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
>> (1) They used Array2D. They said that their code would not work
>> in 3.5 "because of an Array2D bug". I thought it had been decided
>> that Array2D would not be included in 3.6 because it is just too
>> confusing? (Their code would have been clearer with an array of
>> arrays anyway.)
>>
> Somebody should do:
> a) make a Array2D package available on SqueakMap
> b) post a [ENH] Array2D-removal to the list
> c) review the Matrix class (that Richard built last year)
> I think this (or something like that) should be part
> of the image.
>
> Marcus
>
> --
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|