On Saturday 06 September 2003 12:21 pm, Ingo Hohmann wrote:

> is there a better way to act on passivation and activation of a
> morph than to overwrite passivate and activate?
> (I just had the bright idea to put a halt into activate in Morph,
> to see if it "get's called", yes it does ;-)

I think it's only SystemWindows that care about activate and 
passivate.

Anyway, there's the #intoWorld event, and also notifyNewOwner: (if you 
have Connectors or Andreas' "Morph Removal" CS loaded).

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE