[Q] action on activation and passivation of morph
ned at bike-nomad.com
Sat Sep 6 20:42:52 UTC 2003
On Saturday 06 September 2003 12:21 pm, Ingo Hohmann wrote:
> is there a better way to act on passivation and activation of a
> morph than to overwrite passivate and activate?
> (I just had the bright idea to put a halt into activate in Morph,
> to see if it "get's called", yes it does ;-)
I think it's only SystemWindows that care about activate and
Anyway, there's the #intoWorld event, and also notifyNewOwner: (if you
have Connectors or Andreas' "Morph Removal" CS loaded).
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE
More information about the Squeak-dev