[FIX] BlockArgumentDescriptionFix ( do not accept )
Daniel Vainsencher
danielv at netvision.net.il
Sun Sep 7 21:00:00 UTC 2003
I don't think you're the first to be confused this way - maybe you can
think of wording improvements and be the last?
Daniel
Mike Roberts <mike at mjr104.co.uk> wrote:
> Because the error you get is "This block requires 0 arguments" and I think, no it doesn't it needs 1. This is one of the newbie things I do all the time. I think I now see that the intent of the error, had I read the method comment correctly, is that the block you have given doesn't expect any arguments. I always read the error as you don't need any arguments for the operation, and you do, you need 1 - but only do: knows this.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|