Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> I don't think you're the first to be confused this way - maybe you can
> think of wording improvements and be the last?
> 
> Daniel

How about: (sorted by decreasing length)

'Number of supplied arguments does not match number of accepted arguments'

or

'This block accepts X arguments, but is called with Y arguements'

or

'This block needs to accept X arguments'

or

'This block is called with X arguments'


> Mike Roberts <mike at mjr104.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>>Because the error you get is "This block requires 0 arguments" and I think, no it doesn't it needs 1.  This is one of the newbie things I do all the time.  I think I now see that the intent of the error, had I read the method comment correctly, is that the block you have given doesn't expect any arguments.  I always read the error as you don't need any arguments for the operation, and you do, you need 1 - but only do: knows this.
> 
> 
>