On Jeudi, sep 11, 2003, at 16:33 Europe/Zurich, Daniel Vainsencher 
wrote:

> It seems most projects have the wiki as a component of their website,
> not the lot of it. For example, see handhelds.org. OTOH, squeak.org
> should point at the wiki very clearly, and should not include any
> fast-changing information. Download info, links to related sites
> (squeakland, squeakfoundation, croquet...) and so forth should be on 
> the
> wiki where we can update them. So IMO, the static site should include
> links to some of those pages.
>
> I don't know how practical this is, but is would be nice if the swiki
> pages were alternately addressable as swiki.squeak.org/squeak/1 or
> something like that. More memorable than minnow...

I agree. It would be good that the search engine on Squeak.org also 
search swiki.


>
> my 0.02 nis
> Daniel
>
> Michael van der Gulik <mikevdg at hetnet.nl> wrote:
>> It's really not that hard to update a web-site! It's just a case of
>> putting files in the right place on a server. Things like websites
>> shouldn't be wiki's because wiki's were never made for that; wiki's 
>> are
>> sort of half-way between a web site and a newsgroup. I would also not
>> imagine that a wiki could handle big loads.
>>
>> mikevdg.
>>
>> Simon Michael wrote:
>>> Hi Marcus.. YAGNI. And when you do need it, you simply lock down the
>>> front page for a while.
>>>
>>> I'd rather have a vibrant, live, cooperative site requiring a little
>>> ongoing cleanup than a perfectly safe, closed, stale one.
>