Keep deprecated methods for one or two versions? (was Re: Aboutdeprecated methods)

ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Sun Sep 14 15:47:46 UTC 2003


Hi daniel

My mistakes ;) I forgot to publish some changes, especially a big one. 
So I will just update and use deprecated:.
I'm in crunch time for my book and want to push the version one of 
SmallWiki. so this is perfect for now.

stef

On Dimanche, sep 14, 2003, at 16:47 Europe/Zurich, Daniel Vainsencher 
wrote:

> Theoretically, fine, but the KCP page
> (http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3257) lists changes 96-102, of 
> which
> 98-101 are already included. So
> - I am wary of reviewing changes in a list that's obviously out of 
> date,
> and
> - it doesn't seem like 2 changesets is such a huge backlog anyway.
>
> Anything I'm missing? not that I mind looking at a short list of
> changes, if you feel bad about them going unreviewed.
>
> Daniel
>
> ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>> Perfect for us. So may be we should ask daniel to go over the KCP 
>> items
>> left really soon. I will have more time in the near future and I want
>> to continue cleaning systemDictionary :) I have nearly extracted
>> SqueakImage from it.
>> Daniel :) ??
>>
>>
>>> - Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list