[ANN] Squeak/.NET bridge

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Mon Sep 15 10:14:56 UTC 2003


How much effort would it be to implement ICorRuntimeHost?

Cheers,
  - Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> Behalf Of Torsten.Bergmann at phaidros.com
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:03 AM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: RE: [ANN] Squeak/.NET bridge
> 
> 
> >We recently ported that bridge to Squeak, and have posted a first 
> >release on SqueakMap.  The bridge uses TCP sockets to talk to a 
> >separate .NET VM.  
> 
> Looks nice. But is there a reason why you use (slower) socket 
> communication instead of hosting the runtime VM inprocess inside 
> of the Squeak VM (by implementing the ICorRuntimeHost 
> COM interface) ?
> 
> Bye
> Torsten
> 
> 
> 
> 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list