[ANN] Squeak/.NET bridge
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Mon Sep 15 10:14:56 UTC 2003
How much effort would it be to implement ICorRuntimeHost?
Cheers,
- Andreas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On
> Behalf Of Torsten.Bergmann at phaidros.com
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:03 AM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: RE: [ANN] Squeak/.NET bridge
>
>
> >We recently ported that bridge to Squeak, and have posted a first
> >release on SqueakMap. The bridge uses TCP sockets to talk to a
> >separate .NET VM.
>
> Looks nice. But is there a reason why you use (slower) socket
> communication instead of hosting the runtime VM inprocess inside
> of the Squeak VM (by implementing the ICorRuntimeHost
> COM interface) ?
>
> Bye
> Torsten
>
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|