David T. Lewis wrote:

>I would have voted for "wait two versions", but...
>
>  
>
>>>In fact I would favor to remove them all and create a package with 
>>>them so that people can still load it for documentation purpose.
>>>      
>>>
>
>This is a great idea, so I vote for "wait one version, and save
>the removed stuff in a package for documentation purpose."
>
>We will sometimes have packages on SqueakMap that lose their
>maintainers, or that just do not get updated very often. By keeping
>track of the removed methods as Stef suggested, it will be easier
>for a maintainer to fix problems in an older package.
>  
>

Okay then, I will go with waiting one version then, and keeping the 
removed methods for each Squeak release in a package.  (Stef agreed with 
this too.)

- Doug