Time to condense sources?
Ned Konz
ned at bike-nomad.com
Wed Sep 17 15:56:25 UTC 2003
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 08:30 am, Lex Spoon wrote:
> However, many Squeak users aren't developing Squeak itself, and
> don't care about the history. It would be nice if the minor stable
> releases started having small changes files. It would roughly
> double the amount of images you can have in the same amount of disk
> space, and it would similarly decrease the amount of time it takes
> to ftp images around.
>
> Anyway, it already sucks that history is lost from before 3.0,
> unless you want to load a 2.9 image. We really need a better
> history mechanism at some point, anyway....
We could also supply a corresponding "deep history" changes file for
those interested in going back. I believe Doug has supplied one of
these; I've made them by keeping a local updates server directory and
loading them all into an older image (I believe that I started with a
2.8 or 2.9 image).
--
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|