Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:

>  Alan,
>
>  
>
>>Since SUnit tests seems to corrupt my image, I've been using a seperate 
>>instance for testing VMs.
>>
>>I've found that, on occasion, it will fail fairly badly, then uppon 
>>quitting/nosave and re-trying (exact same sequence of commands) it would 
>>perform brilliantly!
>>    
>>
>
>  You're testing your modified VM, right?
>  
>

I just tested it with my workhorse VM, it is reproducable...
BTW, I just noticed that I had introduced an "at:put:" bug that is 
triggered by the sound effects caused by moving stuff to the trash. =\