AW: AW: [ENH] NewProgressBar
Alexander at Lazarevic.de
Fri Apr 9 11:35:23 UTC 2004
I'm sorry to have caused such a confusion with my badly chosen example,
but I tried hard to clear up the misconception. I did rename the class
and added class comments to describe the special purpose of this morph,
as you can see in the latest update of the changeset. I think it is a
good thing that you don't have to deal with SystemProgressMorph directly
(or understand it's architecture) to use it.
Von: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] Im Auftrag von
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. April 2004 09:40
An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Betreff: Re: AW: [ENH] NewProgressBar
Alexander Lazarevic wrote:
> That the ProgressMorph is still visible after this is no surprise. If
> you terminate the process the progressbar will dissapear. So this is
> no bug and has nothing to do with an unique instance of ProgressMorph.
> So please refrain from the idea of forking processes that contain
> progress updates like above.
ok I give up:) obviously I did not understand the purpose and
architecture of this morph.
thanks for your replies
More information about the Squeak-dev