Avi Bryant wrote:

> all in code not bundled with the image.  So, can/should we rename it to 
> avoid this conflict?  I'm proposing BasicHTTPRequest, to distinguish it 
> from its subclasses PluginHTTPRequest and CachedHTTPRequest.  A 
> changeset that does this renaming is attached.

As I created these beasts a long time ago I would like to propose 
HTTPDownloadRequest :-)
The others could be renamed accordingly (PluginHTTPDownloadRequest, 
CachedHTTPDownloadRequest).

Cheers

Michael