"Andrew P. Black" wrote:
> 
> I'm resending this because a missing ']' in the Subject meant that it
> wasn't picked up by BFAV.  The change set is unchanged.

It was picked up by BFAV, and I have looked at it. 
It looked ready for alpha inclusion, but I did not post a 
review of it yet. I'll take a look at the new one now.
Karl

> This supercedes the change set of the same name sent on 14 July 2004.
> It removes a few more redundant methods, adds some comments (I now
> understand the motivation for the change class code) and eliminates
> duplicate initializations.
> 
>         Andrew
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: Macintosh File
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------