On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 09:47, Ned Konz wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2004 5:37 am, Frank Shearar wrote:
<snip>
> > So what gives? Is it BFAV's fault or the list's? :)
> 
> Probably need to see the mail headers. Who's the moderator of that list?

Me.

This problem has happened once before last week and I sent Frank an
email asking about it and he never responded.  Did you not get my email
Frank?

Anyway, it's a little hard to be certain but here's part of what I get:

Return-Path: <frank.shearar at rnid.org.uk>
Delivered-To: mailman-squeak-harvest at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Received: (qmail 18906 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2004 11:35:53 -0000
Received: from 81-86-64-25.dsl.pipex.com (HELO roke.angband.za.org)
        (81.86.64.25) by mail.theinternetone.net with DES-CBC3-SHA
encrypted SMTP;
        20 Aug 2004 11:35:53 -0000
Received: from [80.168.137.82] (helo=wsfrank) by roke.angband.za.org
with
        smtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1By7gV-0008dW-Gd; Fri, 20 Aug 2004
12:35:51
        +0100
Subject: [BUG][FIX] DRNPFix ( [closed] Committed to BFAV v170 )
X-squeak-bugfix-archive: Yes
In-reply-to:
<20040818092854.JBRQ2608.amsfep12-int.chello.nl at c213-89-92-101.cm-upc.chello.se>
From: 
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:28:00 -0500
Message-Id:
<1093015680.1181.5.camel at 12-222-173-196.client.insightbb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0

From: frank.shearar at rnid.org.uk
References: 
 <20040818092854.JBRQ2608.amsfep12-int.chello.nl at c213-89-92-101.cm-upc.chello.se>

To: Frank.Shearar at rnid.org.uk
To: karl.ramberg at chello.se
To: squeak-harvest at lists.squeakfoundation.org
X-squeak-version: Squeak3.8alpha; latest update: #5976

If there's really a blank line in there that's a definite no-no. 
However maybe that's just something mailman is doing to bring
attention.  Anyway another no-no is the multiple To: headers I believe. 
Hasn't this come up before?  If we aren't certain I'd be glad to find
the official word in this in the appropriate STD RFC.

AThe reason that mailman gives me for rejection of this message is
'Message has implicit destination'.  It's something of a guess, but I
suspect that mailman is searching for the list email address and not
finding it because it is stopping at the first To: header which should
be the only one.

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20040820/f61802e3/attachment.pgp