Am 29.08.2004 um 10:19 schrieb Lantz Rowland:

>
> Perhaps, but active development takes place with the Full Squeak 
> Multimedia
> Distribution and that is our definitive reference not the smaller 
> subset.
>
3.7 this was not true. And it it even difficult: The tools do not tell 
me if I
change a methdod that is part of package. This than has the consequence
that people thend to send changesets that change both image and 
packages,
making it harder to add those changesets to the updatestream. (that is, 
somebody
needs to re-do the changeset to omit the package parts).

So I used the base image to do all harvesting, reviews and image-related
development, not the full image.

> I think it is a bad idea to redefine the concept of what the Full
> distribution contains.
>
when doing the condenseSources, I thought that we did that ("source for
major, changes for minor). That was wrong, so I will redo the image.
(There is another problem that the Fullmage tool removes the 
changeset-history.
If we keep all changes, we should keep those, too).

     Marcus