[ANN] eCompletion - code completion inspired by eclipse
smallsqueak at rogers.com
Wed Dec 1 06:13:56 UTC 2004
Marcus Denker wrote:
> Am 30.11.2004 um 22:41 schrieb Ruben Bakker:
>> How important is MVC for an extension as eCompletion? It worth the
>> effort, or is something that is passing away slowly? Maybe we need to
>> distinguish between development and deployment. For deployment the
>> image can be stripped but for development Morphic could be there...
>> What do you think?
> Yes, and even for deployment: This is end of 2004. Even my notebook
> computer hat
> 2GB of RAM. Most people "deploying" Squeak apps (e.g. with seaside)
> don't strip
> the image, as it's a good idea to have the tools available in the
> deployment image
> for fixing bugs fast.
> There might be some need for stripping if you are doing embedded stuff,
> but then
> you won't need the dev tools or use a setup like squat of resilient
> that allows to debug/browse
> over the net.
> I don't think that MVC is that important: There are I think a bunch of
> people using it (sometime
> there are fixes submitted for MVC that even have been added to the
> release), but overall the
> number of people developing with MVC should be closer to zero than to
> So don't waste your time with MVC is you don't need this for yourself.
This makes perfect sense.
I don't expect the Croqueteers wasting time with Morphic/Squeak ;-)
More information about the Squeak-dev