Smalltalk language limitation ?
Doug Way
dway at mailcan.com
Sun Dec 5 04:56:24 UTC 2004
On Dec 4, 2004, at 11:21 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> If my understanding is right then you cannot send a message to an
> object passed as a parameter to a method of another class.
>
> Is this correct ?
No, you can do this. (If I understand you correctly.) In fact, there
are probably thousands of methods in Squeak that do this. :-)
I just poked around for a minute in a browser, and the third method I
ran across has an example of this. See Rectangle>>areasOutside:. The
method is passed an object (parameter) with the name "aRectangle".
Down in the method, the message #corner is sent to this parameter.
> What about messages to instance variables ?
Not sure what you mean here. If you can get to the instance variable,
you can send a message to it. (It is true that you can't reference an
object's instance variable directly unless you are "inside" that
object. Smalltalk instance variables have the equivalent of
"protected" access in C++/Java-speak.)
- Doug
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|