Going Forward
stéphane ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Sun Dec 19 08:06:32 UTC 2004
you are right. :)
but the key difficulty is how to evolve as fast of possible without
totally frustrating your clients.
So I think that **soon** we will have a set up a plan for the future
:). Wait and see we are preparing something :)))
happy christmas
Stef
On 18 déc. 04, at 22:09, Ken G. Brown wrote:
> With respect to Craig's 'Flow', I have been thinking about the inertia
> caused by the perceived need to make major system changes backward
> compatible.
>
> I used to think that my current situation in life has been determined
> as a result of the sum total of past events and I was sorta stuck with
> what had gone before. Now, I prefer to think of my present as being
> determined by my desired future. Get a clear picture in mind of the
> desired future and today's decisions become much easier, being made
> towards achieving the desired future.
> At each decision point, the decision can be made towards improving the
> quality of that future picture by bringing it into clearer focus.
>
> From this point of view, I think it may be best to get a clear view of
> the future of Squeak, then do today what is necessary to create that
> picture without worrying about the backward compatibility. Those that
> need to and want to, will do the required changes to also partake in
> that desired future, those that don't can remain with whatever works
> for them. The backwards compatibility issues I believe could most
> appropriately be dealt with by those parts of the system that have the
> issues, thereby reducing the inertia for going forward.
>
> In the past, if this way of thinking would have been in vogue, we
> would most likely already be running with Craig's 'Flow' in the
> system. I'm assuming from other opinions that would be a good thing...
>
> The desired future of Squeak determines what we do today, as opposed
> to what was done in the past...
> Of course.
>
> Mark Twain evidently wrote: "Twenty years from now you will be more
> disappointed by the things you didn't do than the ones you did."
>
> Ken G. Brown
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|