Doug Way wrote:
  But you really meant that if you don't need
> (strongly leading) Guides, then why have Guides at all?  Point taken,
> although I don't necessarily agree with you.


ok we can talk now :) I reformulated my point in a new thread: "is 
dynabook still a vision for Squeak ?", so that we can restart from 
scratch in a clean way. I'd like to know your vision.


regards,

Stef