On Monday 20 December 2004 11:38 am, Michael Latta wrote:
> I tried loading Connectors, but it was not a good experience:
>
> 1) There was no published version for any Squeak version.

The connectors2 version is marked as being compatible with Squeak3.7. I hadn't 
published the release, as I considered it temporary. Unfortunately, I haven't 
been able to update it as I had intended.

However, the code loads into the stock 3.7-5989 image fine.

It is now published for 3.7.

> 2) After saying take any version it could find, it was missing a
> prerequisite.  Loading anyway only loaded code that was missing other
> classes.

What prerequisite? Did you load Monticello?

> 3) Assuming I did the wrong thing by going to SqueakMap, I went back to
> the SqueakMap page and tried the home page link, only to be told it did
> not exist.

The home page link is to a .sar file for some reason. I fixed that.

> This is not a good testament for Squeak.  I do not know if it is just a
> lot of undocumented magic tricks to make this work, or what.  I would
> really like to use Squeak, but it is getting harder and harder to see
> it as anything more than a collection of unfinished research projects.
> Please help me correct this impression.

I'm trying.
-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com/squeak/