Sorry julian,

I do not want to vote because this MY time and the time of MARCUS that 
is in question now.
I would really prefer MARCUS and I spend *******OUR********* time on 
doing something else than splitting changesets
to remove tests. Then this will be also the mess because tests can get 
desynchronised from the code they test
as we do not have a way to control exactly which package works with 
which other package today.

Sorry to be rude.

Marcus and doug are Guides and I trust that what they are doing during 
***their*** evenings
is good for Squeak.

Stef


On 3 févr. 04, at 11:39, Julian Fitzell wrote:

> Ok, I can't stand to see this thread blossom again.  To avoid any more 
> pain and suffering I propose we vote on it and be done.
>
> I have posted my argument against putting the tests in the update 
> stream at: 
> http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/julian/diary.html?start=0
>
> I also posted an article on squeak people to collect the votes.  It is 
> at: http://people.squeakfoundation.org/article/25.html
>
> It would be great if someone could post a diary entry for the other 
> side of the argument and I will add that link to the article.
>
> I figured we could give until sunday evening for people to vote.  Vote 
> +1 in favour of putting the tests in the update stream and -1 agains 
> it (or something in between).
>
> Please remember we are voting only on whether to manage the tests 
> through the update stream. We are not voting on whether the tests 
> should be included in the image(s) that you download from the squeak 
> website. The two issues are separate and I don't believe there is any 
> disagreement that the tests should be in the downloadable image.
>
> Happy voting,
>
> Julian
>
>