Avi Bryant <avi at beta4.com> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 8, 2004, at 11:42 PM, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> 
> > Well, note that cooperation on a project doesn't need people to be
> > co-maintainers - they just need to be able to write to the same
> > Monticello repo.
> 
> Why?  I know that Brent and Ken, for example, each have their own repos 
> for the BFAV work.  Monticello was designed with the assumption that 
> versions for any given package would be spread out over multiple 
> repositories.

Well, right. :) You know what I mean. But anyway - can someone specify
more clearly how the mechanism should work? Dynamic co-maintainership
using SqP (>apprentice or such rule)? Or something else?

Should I simply add a "shortcut button" and a dropdowlist like:

[button:add comaintainers] that are [dropdown with apprentice, master
etc] on SqP.

regards, Göran