On Feb 11, 2004, at 1:35 AM, marcus at ira.uka.de wrote:
>
> This is just a .cs with the package content, for the update
> stream.
>
> I guess it's small enough to handle it this way.
>
> But we need a better way to deal with in-image MC packages"

Yes, the annoying thing about doing it this way is that the image 
doesn't record what version the code belongs to, so if people later 
want to submit new versions of the package, the ancestry would be 
wrong.

What's wrong with putting a doIt into the update stream that installs 
the package from SM?