Towards Improving Bug Reporting and Harvesting
John Pfersich
jp1660 at att.net
Fri Feb 13 03:42:07 UTC 2004
But if there was a more intelligent way to link the bug and the fix (like a
bug/enhancement id), then it would be simple to link the two. A tracking
system similar to usezilla (used by openoffice.org) would be really nice.
It's not email based, but it can accept emails as well as other files as
attachments.
>just some thoughts after harvesting during 30 min.
>We need a way to
>
> - really sort/identify packages.
> - we need a way to link BUG and FIX because something a thread with a
>BUG does not contain a
> FIX but the FIX somewhere else.
>
>I only have problems no solutions :_) (a lot of researchers would
>loved me :))))
>
>
>Stef
>
>On 12 févr. 04, at 22:10, Ken Causey wrote:
>
>> Marcus,
>>
>> Frankly after thinking about this more I'm seriously thinking of
>> elminating email from the equation altogether. At least from the
>> backend. Right now a good 90% of the BFAV client and server code
>> exists
>> purely to parse and build email. Not to mention HTTP. What a waste of
>> time.
>>
>> I'm thinking hard and reading about SoapOpera and OperaORB.
>>
>> Ken
>>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|