Remaining to-do items for 3.7
John Pfersich
jp1660 at att.net
Tue Feb 17 23:53:54 UTC 2004
Doug Way wrote:
>On Sunday, February 15, 2004, at 06:38 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
>>
>>What do we do with these SqueakMap entries? Remove them? Somehow
>>retire them, so they
>>are available for 3.6 but not for 3.7?
>
>At the very least, 3.7-compatibility should be removed for those
>packages. Perhaps Goran or some other SM admin could do this?
>
>It would be nice if there were some good way to indicate that these
>packages are already incorporated in the basic image. (Retire them,
>as you say.) I suppose a comment could be tacked on to the
>description of each one. Deleting them altogether is probably too
>extreme... a 3.6 user might want to be able to use them.
>
>- Doug
Can't packages already be marked that way (at least textually)? It
would be nice to see packages like that disappear when the 'display
new or newer packages ' is set. I don't think it is.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|