On Feb 17, 2004, at 10:17 PM, Ned Konz wrote:

> On Tuesday 17 February 2004 9:35 pm, Timothy Rowledge wrote:
>
> MC version?
> 	Any of the more recent ones. The latest from SqueakMap looks to be OK.
Drifting even further off topic for a moment, I notice that the package 
loader now has a directorytree like display when there are several 
versions available. I assume it always loads the latest one unless you 
specifically choose one of the  others.

>
>> SARBuilder?
> 	Not until I post a version that works with the new MC. For now, make 
> little
> scripts like I posted.
Okelly-dokelly.
>
>
>> When I 'download' in with SM2 where do the dang files go? I can't see
>> them anywhere)
>
> Look in the package-cache directory.
Ah, now goran says 'sm', which does seem a bit more likely since Avi 
said package-cache was a cache for MC. Have you guys considered merging 
these into a single concept?

Actually the package-cache thing puzzles me a touch. Why ask the user 
for a repository location (of the local sort anyway) if it's going to 
use package-cache anyway? What's the logic intended here? I can see why 
having a cache of a http repository makes sense.

tim