BitBlt>>pixelAt: does 0-based indexing?
MartinKuball at web.de
Sat Jan 3 14:26:40 UTC 2004
I'm trying to do some image processing in Squeak. I load an image into a Form
and than use a BitBlt peeker to examine pixel values. After some hacking I
noticed that the indexing is not 1-based as in other Smalltalk methods. Is
this on purpose or a bug?
More information about the Squeak-dev