gaelli at emergent.de
Wed Jan 7 11:10:06 UTC 2004
how about sorting the submitted fixes/enhancements according to the
number of "made-it-to-the-image"-_reviews_ the submitter did in the
So on the top of the todo-list one can see the fixes/enhancements of the
helpful people? Maybe it motivates people to help, if this increases
that their own fixes will be reviewed sooner.
Am Mittwoch, 07.01.04 um 10:39 Uhr schrieb Marcus Denker:
> Am 06.01.2004 um 20:00 schrieb ducasse:
>> May be what we are doing is useless after all?
> I really thought about that yesterday... if we judge the "will" of the
> comunity by the actions that the
> community does, then we can clearly state that harvesting is not
> So, what are the negative consequences of adding all the good fixes
> and enh to squeak?
> 1. "You break my stuff. I will need to spend hours to port my projects
> to the new realease."
> Yes. This happens.
> 2. "All those fixes are so boring. I work on more important things".
> Yes. Most of the fixes are far from
> earth-shattering. But nevertheless, this boring stuff needs to be
> done. The best way to do it is to
> do this together, so nobody gets too bored doing it. And, how will
> we ever be able to add interesting
> things if we even don't manage to add a class comment to the image?
> Another aspekt:
> Commenting on fixes is a way to show support to the author. So if you
> think small-land is a cool
> project, please help and make it possible for Small-land to contribute
> to the current alpha-release.
> You like connectors? There are a lot of changesets by Ned that need to
> be reviewed.
> So, but to tell the truth, I really have given up any hope that
> anybody will help.
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de
More information about the Squeak-dev