Clean up BFAV?
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Jan 8 08:51:39 UTC 2004
On 8 janv. 04, at 02:14, Cees de Groot wrote:
> I've been going through the backlog of BFAV, and most of the very old
> posts are either:
> - bad mails with no attachments;
> - stuff that has been fixed.
> Therefore I suggest that for everything prior to, say, Dec 31, 2002,
> 1. Inform the original poster that this bug is going to be
> 2. Close the bug.
> The idea is that if the original author thinks the bug is still
> worthwhile, he/she can resubmit it. This will let everyone concentrate
> on stuff that is actually likely to work, BFAV will operate much
> and in effect asks all 'affected' authors to do a review of their old
> work. I think in light of the sheer size of the backlog this is an
> entirely reasonable action.
> (an alternative would be to move the old stuff to a separate archive,
> make a special 'stalled' status you could select on).
Yeap we were thinking the same because this was bad for our moral :)
> Cees de Groot http://www.tric.nl <cg at tric.nl>
> tric, the new way helpdesk/ticketing software, VoIP/CTI,
> web applications, custom development
More information about the Squeak-dev