Squeak Daemon: Why doesn't Squeak sleep with zero cpu usage?
Marcus Denker
marcus at ira.uka.de
Wed Jan 21 08:08:11 UTC 2004
Am 21.01.2004 um 01:41 schrieb Peter William Lount:
> Hi,
>
> Ned Konz writes:
>>> I've yet to find squeak 3.7a on unix. (See my earlier email today
>>> about
>>> that).
>> What do you mean? I was referring to the 3.7a image, not VM. I'm
>> using the
>> same 3.6g-2++ VM for both tests, and the 3.6 image had around 4% CPU
>> usage
>> and the 3.7a image had about 0.5%.
> I tried simply "updating" a 3.6g image with "load code updates" but
> that
> just causes a core dump. I'll try copying over a 3.7a image and see
> how it
> behaves.
Yes, one of the changesets does a Smalltalk recreateSpecialObjectsArray
which
crashes the unix 3.6g VM.
(It might be a good idea to have a 3.6final-based Unix as an official
release...)
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|