Monticello, SM2, BFAV in 3.7alpha
Michael Rueger
michael at squeakland.org
Tue Jan 27 02:41:36 UTC 2004
Avi Bryant wrote:
> I would argue almost as strongly that we *should* have a package
> definition interface as part of the core. That is, I think it would be
> useful to have a standard Package interface (or, if you prefer, call it
> Categorization) that various system tools like the Browser can depend
> on. Nothing fancy, just a way to tell what discrete groups of code
> exist in the image. SystemOrganizer is one possible implementation of
I can agree with that :-)
> there shouldn't be any viral effect. By the same logic, however, I
> don't think it's crucial that we put it into Basic - since nothing
> should be depending on it, it should always be trivial for a user to
> just load it with a single click from the Package Loader when they want
> it (or load it on demand from an item in the world menu, or whatever).
Exactly :-)
No ramble tags necessary ;-)
Michael
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|