Monticello, SM2, BFAV in 3.7alpha

Brian T Rice water at tunes.org
Tue Jan 27 03:08:25 UTC 2004


I'll second that: what this provides (or can/could provide) is just a way
to abstract over SystemOrganization, and relates to an earlier post of
mine about how the tools might benefit:

http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2003-November/069635.html

So I agree fully about the fundamental use of a Package abstraction in the
basic image.

The Monticello aspect of the issue is different, and I agree there is no
need for it to be in Basic, but a standard full image would be more useful
with it than without.

-- 
Brian T. Rice
LOGOS Research and Development
http://tunes.org/~water/



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list