Monticello, SM2, BFAV in 3.7alpha (was Re: Error during install of KomHttpServer 6.2 in Squeak3.7a-5657 image)

goran.krampe at goran.krampe at
Tue Jan 27 08:04:50 UTC 2004

Avi Bryant <avi at> wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Doug Way wrote:
> > goran.krampe at wrote:
> >
> >> PS. We did more or less decide to stuff Monticello into Basic - 
> >> perhaps
> >> it is high time now that SM2 is running?
> >>
> >
> > We could, if the current version of Monticello is reasonably stable.  
> > We should at least put it on the to-do list for 3.7alpha if we're sure 
> > we want to add it.
> It's stable in that the core functionality works reliably.  It's not 
> stable in that new features (like dependencies) are under active 
> development, and so new releases will be coming fairly frequently.  I'm 
> not sure which kind of stable you're looking for, but presumably the 
> former - the image doesn't have to try to keep up with the bleeding 
> edge releases.

Exactly, so if we should do this pick a "stable" on - 69 perhaps or some
other version that has been used for a while without many hiccups.

regards, Göran

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list